RSS Feed for What a HootCategory: What a Hoot

Here’s Some of Our “Czars”

All these people are appointed by the President, accountable to the President, and can not be “elected” out of office.

So what kind of job do you think they’re going to do?  Are they going to have the free market-based America in mind, or push their own socialist agenda?

  • “Green Jobs” Czar Van Jones (now resigned) – black activist member of American Communist Party and San Francisco Communist Party, who said George Bush caused the 9/11 attack and who wanted Bush investigated by the World Court for war crimes.
  • “Car Czar” Ron Bloom – auto union worker, who has worked to nearly put U.S. automakers out of business, and now has authority over GM and Chrysler. He has said recently “the free market is a joke” and “I agree with Chairman Mao that power comes from the barrel of a gun.”
  • “Auto Recovery” Czar (whatever that means) Ed Montgomery – black radical and anti-business activist. Teaches, at University of Maryland, that U.S. business has caused world poverty. ACORN board member, Communist Du Bois Club member.
  • Communications Director Anita Dunn – told high school students recently that her two favorite philosopher/role models are Mother Teresa and Mao Zedong.
  • Director of White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy Carol Browner – avowed socialist, calls for world governance and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.
  • “FCC Diversity” Czar Mark Lloyd – recently praised Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez for a “great democratic revolution” and for stifling privately owned (non-government) media. He complains that people want to listen to Christian and conservative radio and TV, and lists the ways the federal government can “fix the problem.”
  • “WMD Policy” Czar Gary Samore – Former U.S. Communist. Wants to destroy all WMDs unilaterally as “a show of good faith.”
  • “Weapons” Czar Ashton Carter – leftist. Wants all private weapons destroyed. Supports U.N. ban on firearms ownership in America.
  • “Safe Schools” Czar Kevin Jennings – extreme gay activist, founder of GLSEN, the organization promoting homosexual orientation and support in all American schools; has praised the late gay-rights activist Harry Hay for his defense of NAMBLA, the “Man-Boy Love Association.” Safe schools? Safe schools?

From an article,”Needed: A tenting of the White House”,by Pat Boone in World Net Daily

The Way Things Really Are 10/29/09

This came from a financial blog. The guy hits the nail right on the head.

The speaker of the house today gleefully announced as only she can do that a sweeping new bill has worked its way through the house chamber and once enacted, will provide affordable health INSURANCE for nearly every American.

To do this, the new bill will create a public health INSURANCE company to compete with private insurance companies, require everyone to have insurance, subsidize low income workers by taking from others (again) and require large businesses to cover their employees. Large businesses will presumably (the bill did not seem to consider what large businesses will do to make up the added cost) either pass the cost on to the consumer (another hidden tax further eroding discretionary income) or if competing with foreign manufacturers will probably just go out of business, but heck, congress has been doing that to our workers for a long time so that is nothing new. We will just keep extending unemployment benefits and stick the bill to the next several generations.

The stated price tag for this insurance coverage is estimated at only $894 billion. This $894 billion dollar boondoggle is the result of trying to cover 25 million un-insured with health INSURANCE. Do the math. That is $35,760 for each un-insured. Hey, it’s a government program so what did you expect? A bargain? Consider this. The ancestors of today’s demo goons thought social security would only require $30 per worker per year. Today, the payroll tax bite for that little gem and its offspring Medicare is up to $15,300 per worker per year which is I guess just a Washington style rounding error from the original $30 per year estimate.

So don’t be surprised if the $894 billion swells to the stratosphere just as every other government program has done. The insanity in all this is Obama actually praised Medicare many times as being a good example of what can be done in having the government provide this sort of program. I guess he does not realize that Medicare is now under funded by nearly $40 Trillion. But hey, there is no accountability if they are wrong and the future will get the bill, not you and me, so why even care?

We are still in a deep recession, yet here we go again, being led by Obama, down another path of treating the recession with higher taxes, higher costs, and more government spending. And in this case, the government has done absolutely nothing to reign in the originally stated problem of the cost of health CARE itself. This is because the original goal of making health CARE more affordable was very quickly shown to be a difficult goal, so Obama and his spin-minions changed course in March and began marching toward the revised goal of making health INSURANCE more affordable, thus creating a “crisis” in health INSURANCE. Government just loves a “crisis”.

Question. How many long distance passenger rail lines of significance do we have in this country? Other than Amtrak? None that I know of. Keep that thought in mind, because the government has been subsidizing Amtrak and Amtrak in turn has charged less for a ticket than its costs would otherwise indicate. Hence, there are no other long distance passenger rail lines because the private sector is not allowed to just print money. It has to earn it. So private enterprise can not compete with government.

Apply this Amtrak analogy to the fact that the government is going to sell health INSURANCE and compete against the private health INSURANCE companies. The only reason to buy the government’s insurance would be that it is cheaper, that is a given. So, if it too is subsidized just like Amtrak (remember the $894 billion estimate – that is the estimated cost of subsidy at this point), how then is there to be a different result? How are we to avoid wiping out most private sector health INSURANCE companies? This is a very real possibility, but we should not question Obama as that is un American.

These same goons in government garb recently tried to provide housing for nearly everyone in America by creating two public GSE’s (Fannie and Freddie) that were to help lower the cost of a MORTGAGES instead of increasing discretionary incomes (cutting taxes) or making the cost of HOUSING itself more affordable. Do you remember what happened? The cost of HOUSING increased due to the bubble demand created by the government assisted mortgage programs. The result, HOUSING costs for everyone went up, and then the MORTGAGES failed and many more people than were originally helped saw their life savings wiped out as the stock market failed, as the value of their real estate declined, and as the round of foreclosures still working its way through our economy put people in the streets, literally, after losing their jobs and their houses. In the end, the government’s attempt to provide a government assist to home ownership actually deprived millions of their homes, and many more millions of their livelihood. Did socialism work? No. So heck, let’s try it again anyway.

So we are now going to spend $35,000 per uninsured, raise the cost of doing business, become even less competitive with overseas suppliers, and hope the taxpayer is still too dumb to see the real cost of doing this. So I say yippee. We have now “fixed” the health INSURANCE “crisis”. In Washington speak, “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste”.

What have we done to make health CARE more affordable? Nothing. We gave up on that “crisis” in March because changing that paradigm would have stepped on too many toes belonging to too many special interests that donate too many funds to Political Action Committees just as did the GSE’s and the banking Industry in the last debacle. So with health CARE costs continuing to climb, and health INSURANCE costs capped at will by the government (we will probably have another Czar, yippee again), the health INSURANCE industry is going to be in for a rough ride, just as a passenger rail line would be in if it tried to compete with Amtrak. We are not supposed to think of these things. Instead, just trust Pelosi. After all, she is from a state that is now broke. So let’s be more like California.

The bottom line is simply this. In Washington, one “crisis” is as good as another, because a “crisis” is a blank check to expand the role of government. So, if you don’t have a crisis, you can just create one. Housing, global warming, health INSURANCE, etc., etc. See what I mean. With every crisis, you lose more of your freedoms and government gets even bigger, employing more and more people that do nothing of value at great cost, pushing the deficits higher in the process.

America, I am convinced, will fail from the enemy within.

“Oh say does that Star Spangled Banner Still Wave . . .?

I wake up many mornings now and ask myself how “long will our flag as we know it wave?”.  Part of the reason is that we are constantly being lied to by the mainstream media.  You can lie not only by telling a lie, but by omitting things in your so-called “truth”.  The images below are from Glenn Beck’s site, while the videos are from YouTube.

Why didn’t the mainstream media tell us about this?  These people are marching legally, publicly which is a right guaranteed by our Constitution, in public protest against what our government is trying to do to us.  If there were two liberals marching against something there would be around-the-clock-breaking-news coverage by the mainstream media clowns.

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Take a look at the signs.  Do they look anything like the signs on the bottom of this post, displayed in an anti-Bush rally?

Freedom Finder

Let’s Compare Some of the Signs at the 9/12 Rally with those of an anti-Bush Rally

So here are some of the signs at the 9/12 rally, described by a liberal blog as “often racist, radical portrayals of Obama”:

 

 image

 

image

 

 image

 

image

 

Here are some of the signs at an Anit-Bush rally. 

image

Burn him in effigy

image

image

So I guess the Nazi comparisons started against Georg Bush and not Obama – Not even by Nancy Pelosi!!

image

image

image

And the Masterpiece of Civility:

image

Gee, nothing degrading here, huh?  Oh wait, that’s Bush, so I guess it’s OK.

How short are the memories of the liberal media!!

 

Freedom Finder

Another Video – the Truth

Tim Hawkins puts the truth to song in this video.

 

 

Freedom Finder

Wonder How The media’s going to demonize this?

Here’s just one of the many videos that will be on YouTube about the 9/12 March on Washington.

No matter what the “media” sees they try to give the impression that any Conservative demonstration, if the demonstrators are  or for the USA and for making the politicians stick to the Constitution, are part of the Right Wing Conspiracy.

Take a look at this video and see if the demonstration is only “a couple of thousand people” as the media was predicting – if they even give it any coverage!!

If the demonstration only contained two people, and was against the “rich Americans”, they’d be Johnny-on-the-spot, showing how big and great the demonstration was.

Take a look and see if you can figure out what you think this march on Washington is about, then look at the media coverage later.  Again, if they even give it any coverage:

 

 

 

Freedom Finder

The Tea Party Express

It looks like FOX is going to have a tour a little later this year called the “Tea Party Express”.  Its goal is to help us to take back our country from the radical liberals in charge now.

When George W. Bush was the President, the media touted the “take back our country” mantra as a good thing.

Let’s see how they flip-flop when Conservatives are talking about looking to “take back our country”.

Will they still use those tired old “tea bagging” perverted sexual references?  By the way its kinda funny how the only people who knew about the perverted sexual were the media and the Libs.

Watch the video -

Freedom Finder

White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over

‘Jihadists’ and ‘global war’ no longer acceptable terms

By Jon Ward and Eli Lake WASHINGTON TIMES

It’s official. The U.S. is no longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." Neither is it fighting "jihadists" or in a "global war."

President Obama’s top homeland security and counterterrorism official took all three terms off the table of acceptable words inside the White House during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

"The President does not describe this as a ‘war on terrorism,’" said John Brennan, head of the White House homeland security office, who outlined a "new way of seeing" the fight against terrorism.

The only terminology that Mr. Brennan said the administration is using is that the U.S. is "at war with al Qaeda."

"We are at war with al Qaeda," he said. "We are at war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al Qaeda’s murderous agenda."

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in March that the administration was not using the term "war on terror" but no specific directive had come from the White House itself. Mr. Obama himself used the term "war on terror" on Jan. 23, his fourth day as president, but has not used it since.

Mr. Brennan’s speech was aimed at outlining ways in which the Obama administration intends to undermine the "upstream" factors that create an environment in which terrorists are bred.

The president’s adviser talked about increasing aid to foreign governments for building up their militaries and social and democratic institutions, but provided few details about how the White House will do that.

He was specific about ways in which Mr. Obama believes words influence the way America prosecutes the fight against terrorism.

Mr. Brennan said that to say the U.S. is fighting "jihadists" is wrongheaded because it is using "a legitimate term, ‘jihad,’ meaning to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal" which "risks giving these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve."

President Obama Doesn’t Want a Single Payer Health Plan – RI-I-I-GHT

Well, let’s see what his new “Disinformation Czar” points out in her video that the President said as to what the President has really said!!

Click the link to see the TRUTH

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/28961/

 

So where’s the “disinformation”?

I guess what’s good for the goose is not necessarily good for the Gander!

House Buys $200M Jets for Lawmaker Travel

Wednesday, August 5, 2009 11:48 AM
By: Jim Meyers
Article Font Size

The House has approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite jets for transporting members of Congress and other top government officials.

The Air Force had requested one Gulfstream 550 jet, which cost about $65 million. But the House Appropriations Committee added another $132 million to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill for two more jets, and "specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials," Roll Call reported.

It was just last year that lawmakers sharply criticized the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington by private jet for a hearing about a bailout of their companies.

The Gulfstream 550 is capable of flying long distances without refueling. The company’s promotional materials say: "The cabin aboard the G550 combines productivity with exceptional comfort. It features up to four distinct living areas, three temperature zones, a choice of 12 floor plan configurations with seating for up to 18 passengers."

Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, told Roll Call that if Congress wants to buy new jets for the comfort of top government officials, "I think that all needs to be justified on the merits . . . Certainly, lawmakers can fly, and many do, coach and business class."

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 

After squawking and publicly degrading private industry CEOs for riding around in their private company jets, its OK though for lawmakers to spend money we don’t have on luxuries for themselves!!